Installing 4 Chainrings

To Climb Almost Anything Without Difficulty

The tandem towing the trailercycle

Pulling a tandem and a trailercycle, sometimes with a heavy load, requires low gears.

Climbing hills on a tandem-trailercycle combination, sometimes with a heavy load, requires low gears. I am not exactly a strong climber and neither are my two stokers Add to that the typical touring loads, and it is quite easy to understand why low low gears would be useful.

The original configuration

The tandem came with an FSA Gossamer tandem crankset. It uses a 5-arm spider, with 130/74 mm bolt circles. In practice, it means the lowest gears that can be installed are:

–  small ring:   24 teeth minimum;

–  middle ring: 38 teeth minimum.

Right from day one, I had the tandem configured with the smallest chainrings possible, 48-38-24 (instead of 52-40-30) and with a 12-34 cassette, but even then, I found that climbing in the 24/34 gear (19 gear-inches) was hard to do with any grades steeper than 7 or 8%.

Looking for solutions

I excluded makeshift solutions where I would have ended up with a different right stoker crank . Since all three other cranks are tandem-specific, my options were:

–  finding a different crank that would be compatible with the rest of my drivetrain (which one?);

–  getting an entirely new 4-arm mountain crankset (22 teeth minimum);

–  getting a 5-arm mountain crankset (20 teeth minimum);

–  getting one of the TA Cyclotouriste crankset with 58/94 mm or 58/110 mm bolt circles (20 or maybe 19 teeth minimum).

The last two options are particularly expensive and the first one provides minimal improvements. What else ? Well, there are one or two manufacturers that have manufactured adaptors allowing one to use small cogs in lieu of chainrings. Enters the Mountain Tamer Quad.

The Mountain Tamer Quad

The Mountain Tamer Quad Plus uses this adaptor, onto which slotted cogs are attached.  (Photo: Abundant Adventures website)

Abundant Adventures offers the Mountain Tamer Quad Plus, which basically consists of an adaptor, slotted cogs, spacers and a retainer ring. Here is the lowdown.

Preliminary Checks

A few checks have to be made prior to installation. The company website (and their FAQ) highlights the potential pitfalls and is a must-read. In my case, the following checks had to be made.

Are the shifters able to shift through all four rings?

STI shifters are de-facto incompatible with a quad, because they have precise positions. Likewise, I suspect Ergo shifters would not work. By contrast, current bar-end and downtube use a friction left shifter, which means one may position the shifter whereever necessary rather than in a given notch.

With a bar-end shifter, one needs to check if the shifter will move the derailleur enough to travel across four rings. I moved the chain out of the way and checked that it would work.

Is the derailleur cage high enough to cover all those gears?

Shimano advertises its front derailleurs for 22 teeth capacity. But adding a fourth ring means the derailleur will travel further. When it travels left and right, it also goes up and down. A few measurements showed me that I could go with a 31 or 32-teeth gap between extremes.

Do I have enough room near the chainstay to add a fourth ring?

In my case, I had about 1-2 mm to spare after installing the fourth ring. Had there been insufficient space, I could have moved the bottom bracket a bit to the right (with a spacer) or I could have installed a new longer bottom bracket.

Is the derailleur able to move across all rings?

In my case, the derailleur didn't go close enough to the seattube to allow ideal shifting to the granny. I filed slightly a non-essential piece of metal and the derailleur was able to go closer to the seattube. Problem solved.

Which gears do I want to use the most?

Another aspect to consider is chainline. My chainline is good with the outer three chainrings. It means that the new small chainring is definitely "too much inside". Not a problem, as long as it is used with the large cogs only.

Is the rear derailleur good enough?

Or more specifically is it a long-cage derailleur? I now have 48-18 in front and 11-32 behind, for a total of 51 teeth differencial, rather than the 43 or 45 advertised by Shimano. In practice, it means that the derailleur floats when I am on the small chainring and the 3 smallest cogs. Not a problem.


The Quad adaptor comes with instructions photocopied on paper (i.e. no marketting department here). Instructions were clear, detailed, and I think that anyone with mechanical fingers but no knowhow of crankset repairs will know what to do. I had never touched a cransket before and didn't have any problem to do the work.

Basically, I proceeded as follows:

–  I removed the rear right crank of the tandem and removed the inner ring I had. I was left with a "double crankset" with its 48-38 rings bolted on the outer 130-mm bolt circle.

–  Since the inner ring was bolted on integrated bosses (i.e. no spacers), I had to file these bosses to install the quad adaptor. It took me about 30 minutes of careful filing, but I ended up with a neat job, no scratches on the central ring, etc.

A view from the top, showing the clearance between inner ring and chainstay, as well as the makeshift stopper

This picture shows the amount of clearance I have between the chainring and derailleur when I am in high gear. At the other end, the chain is on the second cog.

–  It is then a simple procedure to install the adaptor and the two rings which are, I think, NOS Suntour cogs, plus the spring and the lock ring.

    I could have moved out the crank a bit, either by installing a 1 or 2 mm spacer on the bottom bracket to move it out a bit, or by installing a new bottom bracket. Although I bought the 1 mm spacer, I didn't need to install it.
Incidentally, if I had to install the spacer, I would have needed to visit a bike repair site (ex. Park Tools), because Abundant Adventure's instructions do not detail this specific installation.

–  Shifting towards the granny was unreliable. Sometimes it shifted well, sometimes too much and sometimes not at all. I installed a homemade stopper to prevent the chain from falling onto the bottom bracket. That way, the chain always stays put. Problem solved.

Another installation: changing the front derailleur

The tandem used a Shimano Ultegra front derailleur. Even though it shifted all four rings, downshifting towards the first two rings was never perfect and upshifting to the largest ring was sometimes hard. Then one day, the derailleur cage broke.

I replaced it with a Shimano 105 derailleur: same looks, same functionnality (it seems) and cheaper.

The results surprised me quite pleasantly. All shifts are now smooth and non problematic. In other words, the 105 works better than the Ultegra.

The Results

In high gear with the Mountain Tamer Quad

In super low gear with the Mountain Tamer Quad

Two views of the drivetrain with the Mountain Tamer Quad: in high (top) and low gear(bottom).

The black plastic collar seen on the seattube (it looks like it is just above the left chain) is my homemade chain stopper. It started its life as the part to attach a MEC taillight to the seatpost.

I am very pleased with the result, especially with the new derailleur. There are a few points to note:

–  In theory, my chainline is not perfect. In practice, it is probably better that way

–  The small granny is used with only the 3 (or 4) largest cogs, so the fact it's useable with only the 4 largest cogs is not a limitation.

–  The second ring is now useable only with the first 5 cogs, and then the chain rubs slightly against the 3rd ring (38). I think I will modify the 38 to move it 0.5 mm closer to the 48, so I'll be able to use the 2nd ring with the first 6 or 7 cogs. Not that I plan to ride with an oblique chainline, but it's nice to be able to...

–  The third chainring works with all nine cogs. Is it the ring I use most of the time and I do use it through all nine cogs (though mostly with cogs 1 or 2 to 8).

–  The fourth chainring works fine with all but the largest cog. And I can use the large–large combo without breaking anything.

Oh! Aren’t you afraid to fall while climbing with such low gears?

No. Having such low gears allow me to climb hills while spinning at a good clip, at 60-70 revolutions per minute. Keeping the bike upright is obviously more difficult at 5-8 km/h than it is at 30 km/h, but for a given speed, it is much easier to keep it upright when one spins at a good clip than one slugs with difficulty. To make a long story short, in my lowest gear, I typically climb at 4-5 km/h and I have climbed a few at 2.5 or 3 km/h! And in spite of what many think, it is definitely faster and easier than pushing the same heavily loaded bicycle on a steep incline.

An added factor is traction. On sand, snow or ice, I have limited traction on the rear wheel because I have lightweight stokers. It is therefore very important to pedal smoothly to avoir any slippage. Again, very low gears help maintain a smooth pedal stroke.

© 2005  —   Updated on: 2010-08-15




Les triplettes de Montréal

Les triplettes de Montréal

Vous voulez me contacter ? Voici l’adresse : You want to reach me? Send-me e-mail:

Maquette et conception du site : Site design: Michel Gagnon